If vows added to the
baptismal promises identify certain life-styles, and the counsel of poverty vowed
publicly reminds the whole Church that “You can’t take it with you when you
go,” what is this celibacy thing all about?
The married must be
chastely celibate to all except their marriage partner. They sign the fruitful
love of Christ Jesus in their marital love. But what does total celibate
chastity mean for religious who vow this
counsel publicly? What does their vow of chastity mean in an age of
recreational sex?
Catherine of Siena believed
that poverty was the most basic of the counsels, for if the human heart if
fixed on a relationship with the Holy One as its one non-negotiable, then
celibate love and a listening heart fall right in place. Sandra Schneiders,
IHM, takes another view. She is convinced that only someone wildly in love
could vow poverty and obedience as a life-style.
I think they are both
right. Catherine, from the angle of a basic value, and Sandra, from the angle
of desire. Most view celibate chastity as something one does not do. One vows to fast from genital
sex. But why would one do that? Only when the longing tells the person it would
not be enough, when one’s desire is fixed on something more. So heated is that
desire, that it stops at nothing short of union with the Holy. Nothing else
will do…no matter how long I have to wait. This takes a love of white-hot
heat…a love stronger than death. The totally celibate lover is a sign in the
Church of its ultimate union, whatever the life-style each of us have lived.
This wild love-in-waiting
can hardly be imagined in today’s world of “If it feels good, do it!” To fall
in love with a beautiful human being and not have to “have” them is counter
cultural. But it is real. It happens to both the married and to religious.
Celibates, married or religious, know. Healthy religious celibates too are wild
lovers. Ask them. You might be amazed at their stories.